Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-26-10 at 12:44 -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> A 'filter' cares about a key or two, and might even want to remove it
> from the stream, rfkill is a good example.

The patch introduces two different features that work nicely together
but, by no means have to be used together.

1) set interested events

  By default, -all- events are delivered to an event device.  you only
  get selective delivery when you explicitly use the 'set bits' call.


2) filter

  Filter all events that have been delivered to the user from further
  propagation.


Notice that if you do not use feature #1 then you get all keystrokes
delivered to you (unless someone with a higher priority than you did
some filtering).  If you then use feature #2 then you filter everything
(since everything is delivered to you).



I really do think that this is good for your use case.  Your use of it
would basically involve opening the event device and saying
"ioctl(turn_filter_on);".  The default case is that all keys are
delivered (and therefore blocked from anyone below you).



Cheers

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux