Re: [PATCH] DMA: Correct invalid assumptions in the Kconfig text

On 10/24/07, Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Otherwise, Acked-by: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks. Are one of you going to pick it up as well?
>

Yeah, I'll pick it up.  I'll leave off the AVR addition to DMADEVICES
because I assume it will come with the future patch implementing the
driver, no?

> Håvard

Thanks,
Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] DMA: Correct invalid assumptions in the Kconfig text
  - From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] DMA: Correct invalid assumptions in the Kconfig text
  - From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] DMA: Correct invalid assumptions in the Kconfig text
  - From: "Dan Williams" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] DMA: Correct invalid assumptions in the Kconfig text
  - From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2] ISDN/capidrv: address two longstanding warnings
Next by Date: Re: [2.624-rc1 regression] lost battery information
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] DMA: Correct invalid assumptions in the Kconfig text
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] DMA: Correct invalid assumptions in the Kconfig text
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]