Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option

[Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>]

On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 20:58 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:
> 
> > The user space man pages for set_mempolicy(2) are now even more
> > behind the curve, by not mentioning that MPOL_INTERLEAVE's mask
> > might mean nothing, if (1) in a cpuset marked memory_spread_user,
> > (2) after the cpuset has changed 'mems'.
> > 
> 
> Yeah.  They were already outdated in the sense that they did not specify 
> that the interleave nodemask could change as a result of a cpuset mems 
> change.
> 
> > I wonder if there is any way to fix that.  Who does the man pages
> > for Linux system calls?
> > 

Michael Kerrisk, whom I've copied, does.  I recently sent in an update
to all of the mempolicy man pages that describe the behavior as it
currently exists.  [I need to send in an update for
MPOL_F_MEMS_ALLOWED].

One of the things that has bothered me is that there are no cpuset man
pages to reference from the mempolicy man pages.  [I know, we can and do
refer to the kernel source Documentation, but that might not be
available to everyone w/o some digging.  "See Also" refs typically point
at other man pages...].  To get around this, I had to talk about "nodes
allowed in the current context" or some such weasel-wording in my
updates.

Paul:  what do you think about subsetting the cpuset.txt into a man page
or 2 that can be referenced by other man pages' See Also sections?

> 
<snip>
> 
> 		David

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/