On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:36:47AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Patch looks correct, however it doesn't apply on top of Mark's tree. I
> was able to get it to apply by reverting "(f75375s) fix pwm mode
> setting" first, but then the build fails. Presumably the other f75375s
> patches interact badly. Can you please respin this patch on top of
> Mark's tree (i.e. on top the the 4 other f75375s patches you sent since
> the -rc1 merge)? Thanks.
The surrounding code had wandered to another function, so it's suprising
it applied at all. Here's respin.
--
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
>From 4de69e3ab5b5833cddb503f0dcb2a3ccc2d5b328 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Riku Voipio <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:53:50 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] hwmon (f75375s) fix buggy if() properly
Fix value check in set_pwm_mode(). Instead of checking for
chip variant there, make pwmX_mode sysfs nodes only writable
on f75375 variant.
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hwmon/f75375s.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/f75375s.c b/drivers/hwmon/f75375s.c
index 472b052..6892f76 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/f75375s.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/f75375s.c
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static ssize_t set_pwm_mode(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
int val = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 10);
u8 conf = 0;
- if (!(val == 0 || val == 1) || data->kind == f75373)
+ if (!(val == 0 || val == 1))
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
@@ -549,13 +549,13 @@ static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm1, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
show_pwm, set_pwm, 0);
static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm1_enable, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
show_pwm_enable, set_pwm_enable, 0);
-static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm1_mode, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm1_mode, S_IRUGO,
show_pwm_mode, set_pwm_mode, 0);
static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm2, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
show_pwm, set_pwm, 1);
static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm2_enable, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
show_pwm_enable, set_pwm_enable, 1);
-static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm2_mode, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR,
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(pwm2_mode, S_IRUGO,
show_pwm_mode, set_pwm_mode, 1);
static struct attribute *f75375_attributes[] = {
@@ -656,6 +656,19 @@ static int f75375_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
if ((err = sysfs_create_group(&client->dev.kobj, &f75375_group)))
goto exit_free;
+ if (data->kind == f75375) {
+ err = sysfs_chmod_file(&client->dev.kobj,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_pwm1_mode.dev_attr.attr,
+ S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
+ if (err)
+ goto exit_remove;
+ err = sysfs_chmod_file(&client->dev.kobj,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_pwm2_mode.dev_attr.attr,
+ S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
+ if (err)
+ goto exit_remove;
+ }
+
data->hwmon_dev = hwmon_device_register(&client->dev);
if (IS_ERR(data->hwmon_dev)) {
err = PTR_ERR(data->hwmon_dev);
--
1.5.3.1
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]