Re: [PATCH 1/?] Unlock when sn_oemdata can't be extended

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:19:52 +0200

>      Several unlocking issues
>      Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[email protected]>

Some of these are wrong, for example:

> diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> index 817169e..b09c499 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> @@ -282,8 +282,10 @@ find_inlist_lock_noload(struct list_head *head, const char *name, int *error,
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(e, head, list) {
> -		if (strcmp(e->name, name) == 0)
> +		if (strcmp(e->name, name) == 0) {
> +			mutex_unlock(mutex);
>  			return e;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	*error = -ENOENT;
>  	mutex_unlock(mutex);

Please look at the comment right about this function, it clearly
explains that if the named object is found, the function returns
with the mutex locked.

The rest of the networking cases look OK, please just resubmit
the correct networking cases to [email protected].

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux