From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> > 2) There is no such thing as const task_struct. Anyone who think otherwise
> > deserves compiler warning.
> >
>
> A 'const struct task_struct *' can be used as an annotation to mean that
> no member of the struct is modified through that pointer, so it's
> perfectly acceptable to qualify formals in that manner.
But in one of the cases he un-const's the code does modify
the object through the pointer. At least that one should
be reverted since the annotation is wrong.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
