On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 11:06 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:55:44 -0600
> > [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think there is a compelling case for us to use any efi
> >> services at this time
> >
> > I would almost agree with this if it wasn't for the 1 call that OS
> > installers need to tell EFI about bootloader stuff; I've cc'd Peter
> > Jones since he'll know better what OS installers need; if they don't
> > need it after all...
>
> Yes. I think that is usage of the variable service. Although
> I don't know if that is actually needed.
>
> Support for the variable service is not implemented in this
> patchset.
Support for the variable service has been implemented in this patchset.
The interfaces are:
efi.get_variable
efi.get_next_variable
efi.set_variable
And a sysfs interface (/sys/firmware/efi/vars) is provided in
drivers/firmware/efivars.c, which depends on this patchset to work.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
