Re: [patch 1/1] Drop CAP_SYS_RAWIO requirement for FIBMAP

> I found Chris's comment about negative block numbers, I'll send a patch 
> out for that.
> 
> You mentioned back in 99 about racing with ftruncate.  Is it sufficient 
> to mutex_lock(i_mutex) and down_read(i_alloc_sem)?

One for the fs guys. That code has changed far beyond anything I
understand any more 8)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 1/1] Drop CAP_SYS_RAWIO requirement for FIBMAP
    • From: Mike Waychison <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/1] Drop CAP_SYS_RAWIO requirement for FIBMAP
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/1] Drop CAP_SYS_RAWIO requirement for FIBMAP
    • From: Mike Waychison <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm: noflush resizing (0/3)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ide: fix drive_is_ready() for non-PCI hosts and CONFIG_IDEPCI_SHARE_IRQ=y
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] Drop CAP_SYS_RAWIO requirement for FIBMAP
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/1] Drop CAP_SYS_RAWIO requirement for FIBMAP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]