Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
Ismail Dönmez wrote:
Thursday 25 October 2007 Tarihinde 17:55:00 yazmıştı:
I think the OpenBSD people decided to actually do something about this,
and I suspect it had *nothing* to do with license issues, and everything
to do with these kinds of problems. I wish them all the luck, although
personally I think LLVM is a much more interesting project.

And on the LLVM side all hopes for clang [0] at least for better C++ error reporting ;-)

[0] http://clang.llvm.org/

Someone should take 'sparse' and use that as a C language front-end to LLVM...

Among clang's "features":
	"A single unified parser for C/ObjC/C++"

bleh. I cannot imagine how ugly a C parser gets, after being taught C++. IMO since you can basically redefine everything in C++, it's not a language but a proto-language.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux