Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> This patch contains the planned removal of the eepro100 driver.
>>>
>> Are the e100 people satisfied that e100 now handles all known cases? I 
> 
> Nope.  There are still e100 work outstanding that means we cannot kill
> eepro100.

Agreed, there is still a receive unit hang in the last version that I got from
David Acker.

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
  - From: David Acker <[email protected]>

References:
- [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
  - From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] VFS: new fgetattr() file operation
Next by Date: Re: Opteron box and 4Gb memory
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
Next by thread: Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]