On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:40PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Because:
> > 1) It sort of finishes the initial merge
> > 2) Any breakage should be easy to trigger (build breakage) and easy to fix.
> >
> > It is 1) that make me say this is -rc1 materail,
> > and 2) that say that this is an acceptable 'breaking the rules' patch serie.
>
> Hey Sam,
> I get this after a simple pull from your tree and a: make clean; make:
> LD init/built-in.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o: In function `early_idt_handler':
> (.text.head+0x1e5): undefined reference to `early_printk'
> arch/x86/kernel/head64.o: In function `x86_64_start_kernel':
> head64.c:(.init.text+0xa8): undefined reference to `early_printk'
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `early_panic':
> (.text+0x9c07): undefined reference to `early_printk'
> arch/x86/mm/built-in.o: In function `init_memory_mapping':
> (.init.text+0xc0a): undefined reference to `early_printk'
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
I think this is my changes to the Kconfig.debug path
I received from Randy.
Checking....
Yup - reverting my change bring back EARLY_PRINTK wich is
always required on x86_64.
I will redo the series - and build test a bit more.
Thanks.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
