Re: [x86 patch] Fix UML signal.h build errors

Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 06:30:22PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Fix build errors seen in UML. 
> 
> Al fixed these already.
> 
> FWIW, below is a rolled-up combo patch which make 2.6.24-rc1 UML build.
> 
> It includes Al's build fixes, Wang Cong's driver fix, and a declaration
> mismatch in sched.c.
> 
> 				Jeff
> 

Thats nice, I wonder why I missed them searching on lkml in my gmail box
:(

Is __arch_um__ the right thing to do or BITS_PER_LONG == 32? I prefer
BITS_PER_LONG == 32 over #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__arch__um__).
I guess its a matter of personal preference.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [x86 patch] Fix UML signal.h build errors
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [x86 patch] Fix UML signal.h build errors
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [x86 patch] Fix UML signal.h build errors
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix array overflow
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Wipe out traditional opt from x86_64 Makefile
• Previous by thread: Re: [x86 patch] Fix UML signal.h build errors
• Next by thread: Re: [x86 patch] Fix UML signal.h build errors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]