Re: + reiserfs-dont-drop-pg_dirty-when-releasing-sub-page-sized-dirty-file .patch added to -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:07:37PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> The patch titled
>      reiserfs: don't drop PG_dirty when releasing sub-page-sized dirty file
> has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
>      reiserfs-dont-drop-pg_dirty-when-releasing-sub-page-sized-dirty-file.patch
> 
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
> 
> See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> out what to do about this
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: reiserfs: don't drop PG_dirty when releasing sub-page-sized dirty file
> From: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
> 
> This is not a new problem in 2.6.23-git17.  2.6.22/2.6.23 is buggy in the
> same way.
> 
> Reiserfs could accumulate dirty sub-page-size files until umount time. 
> They cannot be synced to disk by pdflush routines or explicit `sync'
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sorry it's not that horrible. The *data* will still be written to disk.
Only the inodes will be stuck in I_DIRTY_PAGES state, and the pages
stuck in PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY state.

> commands.  Only `umount' can do the trick.
> 
> The direct cause is: the dirty page's PG_dirty is wrongly _cleared_.
> Call trace:
> 	 [<ffffffff8027e920>] cancel_dirty_page+0xd0/0xf0
> 	 [<ffffffff8816d470>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_cut_from_item+0x660/0x710
> 	 [<ffffffff8816d791>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_do_truncate+0x271/0x530
> 	 [<ffffffff8815872d>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_truncate_file+0xfd/0x3b0
> 	 [<ffffffff8815d3d0>] :reiserfs:reiserfs_file_release+0x1e0/0x340
> 	 [<ffffffff802a187c>] __fput+0xcc/0x1b0
> 	 [<ffffffff802a1ba6>] fput+0x16/0x20
> 	 [<ffffffff8029e676>] filp_close+0x56/0x90
> 	 [<ffffffff8029fe0d>] sys_close+0xad/0x110
> 	 [<ffffffff8020c41e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> 
> Fix the bug by removing the cancel_dirty_page() call. Tests show that
> it causes no bad behaviors on various write sizes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux