On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:38:39AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:23:12 +0200
> Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get() no longer has any user.
> >
>
> it's... also a really bad/buggy interface... frquency is a per cpu
> property for one, and constantly changing (esp in a multi-core world)
> even depending on what other parts of the system are doing.
... and such an assumption which would make it impossible to use
the LCD controller on StrongARM-11x0 processors.
This is precisely why we have CPUFREQ - so that hardware which needs
to be re-timed when the CPU frequency changes can get notified of that
event and take the appropriate action. It exists. It works.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
