On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:11:59 +1000 Gilles Gigan <[email protected]> wrote:
> + case WDIOC_SETOPTIONS:{
> + int retval = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (arg & WDIOS_DISABLECARD) {
> + wdt_disable();
> + retval = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (arg & WDIOS_ENABLECARD) {
> + wdt_enable();
> + retval = 0;
> + }
> +
> + return retval;
hrm. So if userspace does ioctl(..., WDIOS_DISABLECARD|WDIOS_ENABLECARD,
that happens to be equivalent to WDIOS_ENABLECARD?
Do all watchdog drivers do it exactly the same way, or are we offering
inconsistent interfaces between different drivers?
An exceedingly minor point, but fun nonetheless.
(And hey, I had to say _something_)
(apart from directing your attention to scripts/checkpatch.pl)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
