Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH] 9p: v9fs_vfs_rename incorrect clunk order

On 10/22/07, Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> In v9fs_vfs_rename function labels don't match the fids that are clunked.
> The correct clunk order is clunking newdirfid first and then olddirfid next.
>
> Signed-off-by: Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] 9p: v9fs_vfs_rename incorrect clunk order
  - From: Latchesar Ionkov <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: update copyright notices
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/9p/v9fs.c: memleak fix
Previous by thread: [PATCH] 9p: v9fs_vfs_rename incorrect clunk order
Next by thread: [PATCH 0/2] CFS CGroup: cleanup & usage reporting
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]