On Tuesday 23 October 2007 20:04:36 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 07:47:11PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 07:43:47PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 23 October 2007 19:41:33 Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > > This patch renames the 4 symbols iommu_hole_init(), iommu_aperture,
> > > > > iommu_aperture_allowed, iommu_aperture_disabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > It replaces the iommu_ with gart_ in the symbol name. All these symbols are
> > > > > only used for the GART implementation of IOMMUs.
> > > >
> > > > That makes it still potentially conflicting with the AGP GART code.
> > >
> > > Maybe yes. But the AGP GART driver conflicts with the GART IOMMU config
> > > option. So I don't see a problem here.
> >
> > It shouldn't. It's perfectly feasible to use both IOMMU and GART for AGP at
> > the same time.
> >
>
> And even if did, it's a big difference between being not able to compile
> in two drivers in the same kernel and not being able to use them at the
> same time.
You can already compile them in all. The functions are not really
conflicting -- otherwise allyesconfig would not work.
I think his goal was to get an prefix that describes the module uniquely.
gart_* clearly does not fulfill that criteria.
So basically he's replacing an ambigious-with-other-IOMMU-implementations
prefix with an ambigious-with-AGP prefix. Seems like a rather pointless
change.
-And
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
