Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections

> 
>  Arguably all the existing linker scripts should be made more consistent I 
> suppose.  Currently all the {init,exit} annotations are handled separately 
> by each architecture, so this would be no exception.  If you have a 
> proposal as to how to do it cleanly, people will certainly appreciate it.

Patches appreciated. I have made many of the linekr scripts use same
format now - so it is easier to see what is equal and can be consolidated.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
  - From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
  - From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Discardable strings for init and exit sections
Next by thread: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]