David Chinner wrote: > Nick, Jeremy, (others?) any objections to this approach to solve > the problem? Seems sounds in principle. I think Nick's shootdown-stray-mappings mm API call is a better long-term answer, but this will do for now. I'll test it out today. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: dean gaudet <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- [patch] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- From: David Chinner <[email protected]>
- Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/10] [SG] Update block layer to use sg helpers
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: don't drop PG_dirty when releasing sub-page-sized dirty file
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
- Next by thread: [PATCH] Allow lazy unmapping by taking extra page references V2
- Index(es):