[PATCH] x86: typo about sequence of cpu_index and cpu_online in show_cpuinfo

[PATCH] x86: typo about sequence of cpu_index and cpu_online in show_cpuinfo

use the real cpu_index instead of 0.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 2d42b41..2196b51 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -89,9 +89,9 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	int fpu_exception;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	n = c->cpu_index;
 	if (!cpu_online(n))
 		return 0;
-	n = c->cpu_index;
 #endif
 	seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %d\n"
 		"vendor_id\t: %s\n"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: don't drop PG_dirty when releasing sub-page-sized dirty file
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] oProfile: oops when profile_pc() return ~0LU
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86_64: set cpu_index to NR_CPUS instead of 0
• Next by thread: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Fix array overflow
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]