Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage

On 10/23/07, Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Well, most people who care about deletion will use the notify_on_release
> callback and retry.

I'm not convinced this is true. Certainly the userspace approaches
we're developing at Google don't (currently) use notify_on_release.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
  - From: Paul Menage <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
  - From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
  - From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
  - From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix warning in mm/slub.c
Next by Date: [PATCH] reiserfs: don't drop PG_dirty when releasing sub-page-sized dirty file
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CFS CGroup: Report usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]