On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:56:52 +1000 (EST)
James Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > @@ -4895,6 +4908,7 @@ static struct security_operations selinu
> > .sem_semop = selinux_sem_semop,
> >
> > .register_security =
> > selinux_register_security,
> > + .unregister_security =
> > selinux_unregister_security,
> > .d_instantiate = selinux_d_instantiate,
>
> You also need to consider whether to allow capabilities to be built
> as an unloadable module. If not, then we don't need this hook added
> back into SELinux. Otherwise, if it is desired, you also need to
> reinstate capability_exit and general modular bits for
> security/capability.c.
>
this just allows 3d party replacements of capability like functions;
there is no need/point to have the existing capability back as modular
to be honest.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
