CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS depreciated? new acpid?

• To: lkml <[email protected]>
• Subject: CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS depreciated? new acpid?
• From: "Jeff Chua" <[email protected]>
• Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:53:02 +0800
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UoSOIeKEoImuzE7fg6hmau5iRe7BFuqHOjqVAbHQe8SOKvTUP+yNRGwbFttH0tPBZrVgS6F704PqGdxEkwHtLVDCRCx6DD6p/ZpV4ckgxocCV9gRJYvVkM9mTanCpt4hJLwQwKUQIpdMcpggaAjb5bOoo3HXl3fn1xxeglDs/DM=
• Sender: [email protected]

Noticed that CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS and CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT are
indicated as depreciated. Does that imply a new acpid is needed to
access /sys instead?

Thanks,
Jeff.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] cifssmb.c: Wrap unused functions in appropriate #ifdef
• Next by Date: Re: futex strangeness in 2.6.23-mm1/UML
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] cifssmb.c: Wrap unused functions in appropriate #ifdef
• Next by thread: [PATCH -v2 0/7] New RT Task Balancing -v2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]