On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:25:04PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> >Now apply the patch upthread, it should've fixed that one (and yes, you
> >are down to the stuff this patch is supposed to fix - and does so here).
>
> Yes, this one is fixed. Thanks for your patch.
>
> But another one comes out. ;(
Jeff had posted a fix for that one a while ago:
-int __sched wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *x)
+int __sched fastcall wait_for_completion_interruptible(struct completion *x)
in kernel/sched.c
FWIW, I would simply kill the damn fastcall thing - right now the only
user is uml/i386; everything else either has it #defined to nothing or
(as i386 does) passes -mregparm=3 while having fastcall expand to
__attribute__((regparm(3))) - i.e. has all functions fastcall.
Do we really need it on uml/i386 enough to keep bothering with that mess?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
