Re: [PATCH] i386: fix TSC clock source calibration error [part 2]

* Dave Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

> The previous patch wasn't correctly handling the 'count' variable.  If 
> a CPU gave bad results on the 1st or 2nd run but good results on the 
> 3rd, it wouldn't do the correct thing.  No idea if any such CPU 
> exists, but the patch below handles that case by discarding the bad 
> runs.
> 
> If a bad result (too quick, or too slow) occurs on any of the 3 runs 
> it will be discarded.
> 
> Also updated some comments to explain what's going on.

thanks - applied in addition to your previous patch.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] i386: fix TSC clock source calibration error
    • From: Dave Johnson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] i386: fix TSC clock source calibration error
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] i386: fix TSC clock source calibration error [part 2]
    • From: Dave Johnson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [2.6 patch] fix CONFIG_TUNER_TEA5761=m
• Next by Date: [RFC/PATCH 4/3] rt: PI-workqueue: fixup the barrier prio
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix TSC clock source calibration error [part 2]
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] i386: fix TSC clock source calibration error
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]