Hi,
I get this on current git: v2.6.23-6597-gcfa76f0:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.376967] ======================================================
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.376978] [ INFO: hard-safe -> hard-unsafe lock order detected ]
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.376984] 2.6.23 #11
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.376989] ------------------------------------------------------
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.376996] artsd/4129 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377002] (&ctl->read_lock){--..}, at: [<c027519b>] snd_ctl_notify+0x50/0x116
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377024]
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377026] and this task is already holding:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377031] (&substream->self_group.lock){++..}, at: [<c027bd9a>] snd_pcm_drop+0x78/0xbb
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377048] which would create a new lock dependency:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377053] (&substream->self_group.lock){++..} -> (&ctl->read_lock){--..}
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377071]
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377072] but this new dependency connects a hard-irq-safe lock:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377079] (&substream->self_group.lock){++..}
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377086] ... which became hard-irq-safe at:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377092] [<c01445fc>] __lock_acquire+0x423/0xc0a
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377108] [<c0145217>] lock_acquire+0x72/0x95
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377121] [<c02fd933>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x42
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377136] [<c0280646>] snd_pcm_period_elapsed+0x3a/0x1fd
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377150] [<c02a65ef>] snd_ymfpci_pcm_interrupt+0x85/0xfc
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377165] [<c02a70f5>] snd_ymfpci_interrupt+0x50/0x1d3
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377179] [<c0150991>] handle_IRQ_event+0x1a/0x4f
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377192] [<c0151a6c>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xab/0xb8
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377205] [<c0106c65>] do_IRQ+0x7c/0x97
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377218] [<c0104c52>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x34
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377232] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377249]
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377250] to a hard-irq-unsafe lock:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377255] (&ctl->read_lock){--..}
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377262] ... which became hard-irq-unsafe at:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377268] ... [<c0144669>] __lock_acquire+0x490/0xc0a
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377283] [<c0145217>] lock_acquire+0x72/0x95
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377296] [<c02fd933>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x42
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377309] [<c0274cb6>] snd_ctl_empty_read_queue+0x12/0x48
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377324] [<c027643f>] snd_ctl_release+0xb3/0xd9
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377338] [<c01721ae>] __fput+0xb9/0x160
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377352] [<c017246f>] fput+0x17/0x19
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377366] [<c016fa18>] filp_close+0x54/0x5c
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377381] [<c0170cbd>] sys_close+0x76/0xb2
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377394] [<c0104202>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377407] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377419]
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377421] other info that might help us debug this:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377423]
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377429] 4 locks held by artsd/4129:
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377433] #0: (&card->power_lock){--..}, at: [<c027bd61>] snd_pcm_drop+0x3f/0xbb
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377454] #1: (snd_pcm_link_rwlock){..++}, at: [<c027bd8d>] snd_pcm_drop+0x6b/0xbb
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377474] #2: (&substream->self_group.lock){++..}, at: [<c027bd9a>] snd_pcm_drop+0x78/0xbb
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377494] #3: (&card->ctl_files_rwlock){..?-}, at: [<c027516a>] snd_ctl_notify+0x1f/0x116
Oct 21 08:50:12 zmei kernel: [ 215.377514]
<snip for vger mail constraints>
The following patch fixes it for me.
---
From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
The lock grabbed in snd_ctl_empty_read_queue() is hardirq-unsafe but we hold
an hardirq-safe one already, so make the &ctl->read_lock also hard-irq-safe.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
--
diff --git a/sound/core/control.c b/sound/core/control.c
index 4c3aa8e..df0774c 100644
--- a/sound/core/control.c
+++ b/sound/core/control.c
@@ -93,15 +93,16 @@ static int snd_ctl_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
static void snd_ctl_empty_read_queue(struct snd_ctl_file * ctl)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
struct snd_kctl_event *cread;
- spin_lock(&ctl->read_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ctl->read_lock, flags);
while (!list_empty(&ctl->events)) {
cread = snd_kctl_event(ctl->events.next);
list_del(&cread->list);
kfree(cread);
}
- spin_unlock(&ctl->read_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctl->read_lock, flags);
}
static int snd_ctl_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
