On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:40:02 +0300, Al Boldi said: > Sure, the idea was to mark the filter table obsolete as to make people start > using the mangle table to do their filtering for new setups. The filter > table would then still be available for legacy/special setups. But this > would only be possible if we at least ported the REJECT target to mangle. That's *half* the battle. The other half is explaining why I should move from a perfectly functional setup that uses the filter table. What gains do I get from doing so? What isn't working that I don't know about? etc? In other words - why do I want to move from filter to mangle?
Attachment:
pgptiSm7emYT1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- References:
- [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- Prev by Date: [patch 2.6.23-git] toplevel Makefile/depmod bugfix
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] synchronize_irq needs a barrier
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- Next by thread: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
- Index(es):