Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> writes:
> * Eric W. Biederman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > thanks for doing this.
>>
>> Yes. keeping this alive is good.
>>
>> The practical question is how do we make this change without breaking
>> the drivers that use their irq argument.
>
> the get_irq_regs() approach worked out really well. We should do a
> get_irq_nr() and be done with it?
The problem are some drivers today pass in 0 for their irq number
to flag that they are calling the interrupt handler in a polling
mode (not from interrupt context?) so the same logic doesn't quite apply.
Do what you suggest would likely break those drivers.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
