Re: [PATCH 4/9] irq-remove: driver non-trivial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric W. Biederman wrote:
[snip] Found issues and ran out of review bandwidth.

thanks for the comments!  I'll work through these.

There are definitely plenty of open issues I haven't yet tackled in the driver area, as you are seeing. As you noted, a lot of these are with drivers doing weird things like calling their own interrupt function with (-1, NULL) or (0, NULL), which triggers some magic "I'm polling" behavior.


 	}
 __out:
 	spin_unlock(&mts->lock);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;

Missing parport code change, see below.

those two parport changes were bogus, and actually got fixed up in patch #9

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux