Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git

Carsten Otte wrote:

First thing we do, is figure whether or not 2.6.23.1 as released breaks our system too. This way, we can either focus on differences between Linus and Avi, or turn on the big red warning sign saying "regression".

Looks like 2.6.23.1 works fine on that box. We'll leave it running over
the weekend with "while true; do make; make clean; done".


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
    • From: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>
  • Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
    • From: Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]>
  • Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
    • From: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>
  • Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
    • From: Mike Lampard <[email protected]>
  • Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
    • From: Carsten Otte <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: fs/buffer.c:nobh_write_end(): NULL dereference
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6.22.5] irq X: nobody cared but X is successfully used by libata
• Previous by thread: Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
• Next by thread: Re: [kvm-devel] severe bug in 2.6.23+ kvm.git
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]