On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > sched_work_sync() with rtnl_lock(). It's only less probable to lockup > with this than with flush_schedule_work(). ...But, not much less... Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- From: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 7/9] irq-remove: scsi driver trivial
- Next by Date: [PATCH 8/9] irq-remove: driver trivial
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] flush_work_sync vs. flush_scheduled_work Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes
- Index(es):
 |