Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Shadow directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jaroslav Sykora wrote:
If anybody can think of any other solution of the "redirector problem", possibly
even non-kernel based one, let me know and I'd be glad :-)

If I understand your problem, you wish to treat an archive file as if it was a directory. Thus, in the ideal situation, you could do the following:

	cat hello.zip/hello.c
	gcc hello.zip/hello.c -o hello
	etc..


Rather than complicate matters with a second tree, use FUSE with an explicit directory. For example, ~/expand could be your shadow, thus to compile hello.c from ~/hello.zip:

	gcc ~/expand/hello.zip^/hello.c -o hello


I think no kernel change would be required.

I'm not keen on the caret. One of the early claims made in http://lwn.net/Articles/100148/ is:
Another branch, led by Al Viro, worries about the locking considerations of this whole scheme. Linux, like most Unix systems, has never allowed hard links to directories for a number of reasons;

The claim is wrong. UNIX systems have traditionally allowed the superuser to create hard links to directories. See link(2) for 2.10BSD <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=link&sektion=2&manpath=2.10+BSD>. Having got that wrong throws doubt on the argument; perhaps a path can simultaneously be a file and a directory.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux