Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB

On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:23:10AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> It would also be nice to balance this out with the utrace merge, as both
> are going to cause quite a lot of pain on the architecture side.

I don't think a utrace merge as in one big merge is going to happen ever.
It's just a too big patch doing too many things at once.  And the flag day
for switching all architectures over is another blocker.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
    • From: Jason Wessel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
    • From: Paul Mundt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
• Next by Date: [RFC PATCH 4/5] Shadow directories: procfs
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]