Re: [PATCH][NET] gianfar: fix obviously wrong #ifdef CONFIG_GFAR_NAPI placement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The check then is to see if a non {}'d block has no statements in it if the
ifdef is null.  Hmmm.  May be possible.  Will think on it.

        if (err)
+#ifdef CONFIG_GFAR_NAPI
                napi_disable(&priv->napi);
+#endif

-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux