* Serge E. Hallyn ([email protected]) wrote: > I guess now that I've written this out, it seems pretty clear > that capget64() and capget64() are the way to go. Any objections? How is capget64() different from capget() that supports 2 different header->versions (I thought that was the whole point of the versioned, rather opaque interface)? I don't object to a new syscall, but I don't see why it's required to avoid breaking libcap. thanks, -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- References:
- [PATCH 1/2 -mm] capabilities: clean up file capability reading
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- From: Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2 -mm] capabilities: clean up file capability reading
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] block: Isolate the buffer cache in it's own mappings.
- Next by Date: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] capabilities: implement 64-bit capabilities
- Index(es):
 |