Stefan Richter <[email protected]> writes:
> What I meant was: First revisions may have had incomplete OHCI 1.1
> support and were sold as OHCI 1.0 chips, and as soon as they stabilized
> it they sold them as OHCI 1.1 chips. But that's mere speculation on my
> part. I can't think of any other reason though why anybody would hide
> OHCI 1.1 compatibility.
Perhaps some MS Windows had troubles with 1.1?
VIA has a history of similar things (e.g. some C3 CPUs).
All 3 chips I have, including that dated 2002, are single
revision "80" so I guess there are absolutely no silicon changes.
> And are you going to test if and how stable OHCI 1.1 features work?
> (Which features are these? Right now only dual buffer reception comes
> to my mind.)
On this old EPIA? No :-)
At least unless I have any doubt.
On the other machine (currently) 1.0? Sure, that's why I did it.
Is the "dual buffer reception" involved in receiving video from
a DV camera, using the new driver?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
