On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, I think you have a very good point here. Ingo, can you verify it
> > > goes away if apply the below? I have to tend to Other Life stuff but
> > > will take this up again tomorrow morning and fix the sg_next() usage.
> >
> > This one will only fix the ones that use the SCSI-lib routines, so it will
> > leave everything else broken, no?
>
> Yes, it'll still crap out if you use debug page alloc for anything else
> :/
So until that is fixed up, how about this? Should cover all block
devices, and I don't think sg_next()/for_each_sg() has spread outside of
that yet.
diff --git a/block/ll_rw_blk.c b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
index 3935469..8708ad0 100644
--- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c
+++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ void blk_queue_max_phys_segments(struct request_queue *q,
printk("%s: set to minimum %d\n", __FUNCTION__, max_segments);
}
- q->max_phys_segments = max_segments;
+ q->max_phys_segments = max_segments - 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_phys_segments);
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]