Re: [PATCH take2] [POWERPC] i2c: adds support for i2c bus on 8xx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Scott,

Do we really need to be adding features for arch/ppc at this point?  It'll
be going away in June.  arch/ppc-specific things outside of arch/ppc itself
will also be more likely to be missed in the removal.

Also, please post inline rather than as an attachment; attachments are
harder to quote in a reply.

OK. I'll remove the ARC=ppc parts.

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc885ads.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc885ads.dts
index 8848e63..a526c02 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc885ads.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc885ads.dts
@@ -213,6 +213,15 @@
 				fsl,cpm-command = <0080>;
 				linux,network-index = <2>;
 			};
+
+			i2c@860 {
+				device_type = "i2c";

No device_type.

Why? Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt says for I2C interfaces
device_type is required and should be "i2c". Is this no longer true?

Should be fsl,cpm-i2c.  Is cpm2 i2c the same?  If not, it should be
fsl,cpm1-i2c.  It's probably best to specify it anyway, along with
fsl,mpc885-i2c.

CPM2 i2c seems to be the same. However, i have no way to test this.

+#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_8XX
+	setbits32(&mpc8xx_immr->im_cpm.cp_pbpar, 0x00000030);
+	setbits32(&mpc8xx_immr->im_cpm.cp_pbdir, 0x00000030);
+	setbits16(&mpc8xx_immr->im_cpm.cp_pbodr, 0x0030);
+#endif

Please add this to mpc885ads_pins, rather than poking the registers
directly.  The relevant lines are:

	{CPM_PORTB, 26, CPM_PIN_OUTPUT},
	{CPM_PORTB, 27, CPM_PIN_OUTPUT},

I noticed cpm1_set_pin32, but this function don't seem to set the
odr register. Will this be added? Then it would be:

	{CPM_PORTB, 26, CPM_PIN_OUTPUT | CPM_PIN_OPENDRAIN},
	{CPM_PORTB, 27, CPM_PIN_OUTPUT | CPM_PIN_OPENDRAIN},


+	/* Select an arbitrary address.  Just make sure it is unique.
+	 */
+	out_8(&i2c->i2c_i2add, 0xfe);

It's a 7-bit address...  and are you sure that 0x7e is unique?  Does this
driver even support slave operation?

It's in fact 0x7F << 1. The same value is used in the 2.4 driver and
in u-boot, as well. Slave operation is not supported.

Why is an 8xx driver matching all i2c cpm (i.e. what about cpm2)?

With the suggested change to use fsl,cpm-command, the driver should
be able to use  both cpm1 and cpm2. The operation and structs for i2c
are identical. The only difference might be the hack^wsupport for
relocation.

Thanks,
Jochen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux