Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm, could we do the arch/x86 changes via the arch/x86 tree instead? 
> We've got about a 100 patches pending there now, under QA, preparing 
> them for pushout. Will check your paravirt patches too, ok?

Yep, that's fine.

    J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [bug] block subsystem related crash with latest -git
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] fix adbhid mismerge
• Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24
• Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]