Re: [patch] sched: schedstat needs a diet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 09:23 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ken Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > schedstat is useful in investigating CPU scheduler behavior.  Ideally, 
> > I think it is beneficial to have it on all the time.  However, the 
> > cost of turning it on in production system is quite high, largely due 
> > to number of events it collects and also due to its large memory 
> > footprint.
> > 
> > Most of the fields probably don't need to be full 64-bit on 64-bit 
> > arch.  Rolling over 4 billion events will most like take a long time 
> > and user space tool can be made to accommodate that.  I'm proposing 
> > kernel to cut back most of variable width on 64-bit system.  (note, 
> > the following patch doesn't affect 32-bit system).
> 
> thanks, applied.
> 
> note that current -git has a whole bunch of new schedstats fields in 
> /proc/<PID>/sched which can be used to track the exact balancing 
> behavior of tasks. It can be cleared via echoing 0 to the file - so 
> overflow is not an issue. Most of those new fields should probably be 
> unsigned int too. (they are u64 right now.)
> 

FWIW I can't see how this patch saves a _lot_ of space. The stats are
per domain or per rq, neither are things that have a lot of instances.

That said, I have no actual objection to the patch, just not getting it.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux