On Wed, Oct 17 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > sg_next() gives you a NULL after the last entry, but tests have been
> > changed to compare against sg_last() which is likely not what we
> > want for those checks.
>
> This of course isn't true, ignore me as I'm still learning how this
> new stuff works :-)
Righto, it's invalid to call sg_next() on the last entry! Let me know if
you need any help with debugging this, unfortunately I cannot test on
sparc64 myself...
(I can say that easily, since I know that davem will a) not rest until
this is fixed, and b) is a really good debugger and will not need my
help)
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
