Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels

>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Jones <[email protected]> writes:

    Dave> Many of these that I've  seen have turned out to be a hardware
    Dave> problem.  Try running memtest86+  on that machine for a while.
    Dave>  It doesn't  catch all  problems, but  it will  highlight more
    Dave> common memory faults.

Hello,

We ran memtest86+ before production, it  was about one month ago. Do you
think it could come from that anyway?

Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]>
- Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

References:
- error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels
  - From: Arnaud Fontaine <[email protected]>
- Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] [PATCH] Fix PCIe hotplug for Dell notebook ExpressCard slots
Next by Date: Re: LFENCE instruction (was: [rfc][patch 3/3] x86: optimise barriers)
Previous by thread: Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels
Next by thread: Re: error: Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1) with different process and kernels
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]