From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:07:20 +0200
> looking at the dev.c code - can napi_struct->weight be zero
> legitimately? If yes then the 0 gets passed to the driver and the driver
> would return 1 - violating the assertion.
I touched upon this in another reply.
For forcedeth it should never be zero, it gets set in
netif_napi_add() to RX_WORK_PER_LOOP which is unconditionally
defined to 64.
Afterwards napi->weight should never be modified and that is
what is passed into n->poll().
Perhaps some memory scribble is causing it to be zero'd.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
