On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:50:43 +0200
Bernhard Walle <[email protected]> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ struct resource code_resource = {
> .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM
> };
>
> +struct resource bss_resource = {
> + .name = "Kernel bss",
> + .start = 0,
> + .end = 0,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM
> +};
> +
> static struct resource system_rom_resource = {
> .name = "System ROM",
> .start = 0xf0000,
> @@ -287,6 +294,7 @@ legacy_init_iomem_resources(struct resou
> */
> request_resource(res, code_resource);
> request_resource(res, data_resource);
> + request_resource(res, &bss_resource);
Looks ungainly, doesn't it? Perhaps we should add a third arg to
legacy_init_iomem_resources(), or change legacy_init_iomem_resources() to
take zero args?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
