Re: [2.6 patch] e1000e/ethtool.c: fix error checks

["Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>]

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> You want to check for the value, not for the address.
> 
> Spotted by the Coverity checker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
> 
> ---
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
> @@ -1451,11 +1451,11 @@ static int e1000_loopback_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data)
>  	}
>  
>  	*data = e1000_setup_desc_rings(adapter);
> -	if (data)
> +	if (*data)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	*data = e1000_setup_loopback_test(adapter);
> -	if (data)
> +	if (*data)
>  		goto err_loopback;
>  
>  	*data = e1000_run_loopback_test(adapter);

I'll forward this to Jeff,

thanks.

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/