Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier: >>> Any idea how to make this proper on all architectures? I will have a look. >> I think the solution is to have an arch dependent kvm_guest_exit(): empty for >> x86, clearing the bit for s390. > > I think we can merge your patches, as the userspace interface seems fine. To > make the accounting work for virtual cpu accounting found on ppc and s390 we > can later add an additional patch that also deals with interruptible guest > contexts. > So something like this should work: > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> > It's fine for me. Laurent -- ---------------- [email protected] ----------------- "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow" E. S. Raymond
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 4/4] Modify KVM to update guest time accounting.
- From: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 4/4] Modify KVM to update guest time accounting.
- From: Laurent Vivier <[email protected]>
- Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 4/4] Modify KVM to update guest time accounting.
- From: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 4/4] Modify KVM to update guest time accounting.
- Prev by Date: Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 4/4] Modify KVM to update guest time accounting.
- Next by Date: Re: What still uses the block layer?
- Previous by thread: Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 4/4] Modify KVM to update guest time accounting.
- Next by thread: Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 4/4] Modify KVM to update guest time accounting.
- Index(es):
 |