Re: [PATCH] Hook compat_sys_nanosleep up to high res timer code

On Sun, 14 Oct 2007, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>  
> > The code looks correct, but I think it would be nicer to change 
> > hrtimer_nanosleep to take a kernel pointer and have all three
> > callers (common_nsleep, sys_nanosleep and compat_sys_nanosleep)
> > do the copy_to_user/put_compat_timespec in the caller.
> 
> Good idea, I had considered that but thought a larger cleanup might run
> afoul of the merge rules :)

Looks good, except ....
 
> --- a/kernel/compat.c
> +++ b/kernel/compat.c
> @@ -40,62 +40,26 @@ int put_compat_timespec(const struct timespec *ts, struct compat_timespec __user
>  			__put_user(ts->tv_nsec, &cts->tv_nsec)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
>  }

Can you put this into a separate patch please ?
  
> --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
> +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
>  	restart = &current_thread_info()->restart_block;
> @@ -1353,7 +1347,8 @@ long hrtimer_nanosleep(struct timespec *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp,
>  asmlinkage long
>  sys_nanosleep(struct timespec __user *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp)
>  {
> -	struct timespec tu;
> +	struct timespec tu, rmt;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (copy_from_user(&tu, rqtp, sizeof(tu)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> @@ -1361,7 +1356,14 @@ sys_nanosleep(struct timespec __user *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp)
>  	if (!timespec_valid(&tu))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	return hrtimer_nanosleep(&tu, rmtp, HRTIMER_MODE_REL, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
> +	ret = hrtimer_nanosleep(&tu, &rmt, HRTIMER_MODE_REL, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
> +
> +	if (ret) {

Can you check for rmtp as well ? rmtp is optional and can be NULL

> +		if (copy_to_user(rmtp, &rmt, sizeof(*rmtp)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/kernel/posix-timers.c b/kernel/posix-timers.c
> index 7a15afb..fc7dac2 100644
> --- a/kernel/posix-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/posix-timers.c
> @@ -980,9 +980,19 @@ sys_clock_getres(const clockid_t which_clock, struct timespec __user *tp)
>  static int common_nsleep(const clockid_t which_clock, int flags,
>  			 struct timespec *tsave, struct timespec __user *rmtp)
>  {
> -	return hrtimer_nanosleep(tsave, rmtp, flags & TIMER_ABSTIME ?
> +	struct timespec rmt;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = hrtimer_nanosleep(tsave, &rmt, flags & TIMER_ABSTIME ?
>  				 HRTIMER_MODE_ABS : HRTIMER_MODE_REL,
>  				 which_clock);
> +
> +	if (ret) {

Ditto.

> +		if (copy_to_user(rmtp, &rmt, sizeof(*rmtp)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }

Thanks,

	tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH] Rework hrtimer_nanosleep to make sys_compat_nanosleep easier
    • From: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Hook compat_sys_nanosleep up to high res timer code
    • From: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Hook compat_sys_nanosleep up to high res timer code
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Hook compat_sys_nanosleep up to high res timer code
    • From: Anton Blanchard <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hitachi disk: spurious completions during NCQ
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Add irq protection in the percpu-counters cpu-hotplug-callback path
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Hook compat_sys_nanosleep up to high res timer code
• Next by thread: [PATCH] Rework hrtimer_nanosleep to make sys_compat_nanosleep easier
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]