On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 07:22:14PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>...
> Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it. In fact, I've reviewed them
> four, but two of them did not apply and the code looked somewhat different,
> so I considered them irrelevant to 2.6.20. I didn't understand that they
> were all related, so maybe I checked them in a wrong order.
>
> I'll recheck all that in the right sequence and will merge them four, or
> get back to you if something still puzzles me.
I discussed this issue with Ilpo just yesterday regarding 2.6.16, and
the result of our discussion was that I reverted it.
TCP being in some situations a bit more conservative than it should be
isn't a big issue and not worth backporting with a risk of introducing
a regression.
I'd recommend you simply drop the two patches for 2.6.20.
> Thanks!
> Willy
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
