Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 01:52:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:44:55 +0200 Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > can you please add http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/30/98 also to the misc-queue for
> > the warning still persists and the patch is good to go as is (against current git
> > v2.6.23-2840-g752097c, for example) albeit with a little fuzziness.
> 
> I got completely fed up with maintaining that patch against ongoing churn
> frenzy in Greg's trees so I dropped it.
> 
> If/when things settle down in that area someone will need to redo the
> patch.

/me wondering: what if you pass it on upstream to Linus, since:
1. it applies cleanly now
2. is pretty trivial
and forget it about it forever :). It seems the place this
patch touches is the only place where kobject_* and sysfs_create_* etc. error
codes are not being handled in contrast to all those functions which have been declared
__must_check?

-- 
Regards/Gruß,
    Boris.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux