Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick

On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 11:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Also, this seems to suggest iperf would like SCHED_BATCH.

Yes.  Throughput falls as preemption climbs.

	-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Reiser4: Drop 'size' argument from bio_endio and bi_end_io
Next by Date: Re: [linux-2.6.git] IDE/ATA fighting over driver name?
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: high-res preemption tick
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]